Younghoon KIM1, Yunsuek KIM1, So-Young JIN2, Hak-Jae ROH3, Hyun-sook KIM1

Myopathy accompanying neuropathy is extremely rare. Clinical features alone may be insufficient to distinguish myopathy from neuropathy.(1) Electrodiagnostic studies such as needle electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction studies (NCS), and muscle biopsies are needed to confirm the diagnosis.(2,3)

A 34-year-old female patient presented with sudden weakness and painful swelling of the left lower extremity. She had also developed multiple bullae that progressed to diffuse swelling (Figure 1a). Laboratory tests resulted in lactate dehydrogenase 881 U/L, aspartate transaminase 264 U/L, alanine transaminase 102 U/L, creatine kinase 23,535 U/L, myoglobin >3,000 (normal 27-75) ng/UL, and aldolase 122 U/L. Antinuclear, anti-Jo antibody, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus were all negative. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated general edema and changes in signal intensity around the posterior segment muscles including the semitendinosus and adductor magnus muscles of the left thigh (Figure 2a, b), but it showed no change in the signal intensity of the left calf muscle (Figure 2c). Initially, there were no specific findings of peripheral neuropathy on EMG or NCS. Despite improvement of bullae, edema, and returning to normal range of muscle enzyme after the glucocorticoid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 250 mg/day for three days) (Figure 1b), the histological findings of the left semitendinosus muscle were nonspecific without interstitial lymphocyte infiltration (Figure 3). Although the patient could extend the left great toe, the left foot plantar flexion and dorsiflexion had not recovered completely. Ultimately, repeated EMG and NCS revealed decreased motor unit activation in the muscles innervated by the left peroneal and tibial nerves. The NCS revealed decreased amplitude, compared with the right side, and suggested a neurogenic condition (Tables 1 and 2). Seven months later, axonal regeneration and the motor unit activation were improved in the same muscles on EMG and NCS (Tables 1 and 2).

Myopathy and neuropathy are generally considered to be different, although concomitant myopathy and neuropathy are rarely reported, called neuromyositis.(4) EMG and NCS are useful tools for identifying neuromyositis.(5) Muscle and nerve biopsies may also be helpful for diagnosing neuromyositis, but further studies are needed to establish the typical histologic findings. Myopathy is rarely accompanied by bullae. If the skin cells are damaged by various causes and their structural function is affected, the cells separate from each other and fluids build up between the separated cells, causing bullae.(6,7) In our case, a similar mechanism was suggested that the rapid progression of myopathy accompanied by neuropathy caused cutaneous edema and dermoepidermal disruption, resulting in bullae.

Although EMG and NCS are useful tests for distinguishing myopathy and neuropathy, the interpretation of the results may vary depending on the time of the tests. Typically, NCS and EMG reveal pathological findings beginning a few days after the onset of symptoms, but they may appear normal for up to three weeks. Therefore, if unexplained abnormal sensation and disability occur, it is appropriate to repeat EMG and NCS.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

This article was supported by the Soonchunhyang University fund.


  1. Watson JC, Dyck PJ. Peripheral Neuropathy: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Symptom Management. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:940-51.
  2. Suresh E, Wimalaratna S. Proximal myopathy: diagnostic approach and initial management. Postgrad Med J 2013;89:470-7.
  3. Ghaoui R, Clarke N, Hollingworth P, Needham M. Muscle disorders: the latest investigations. Intern Med J 2013;43:970-8.
  4. Nguyen TP, Bangert C, Biliciler S, Athar P, Sheikh K. Dermatomyositis-associated sensory neuropathy: a unifying pathogenic hypothesis. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 2014;16:7-11.
  5. Milanov I, Ishpekova B. Differential diagnosis of chronic idiopathic polymyositis and neuromyositis. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;38:183-7.
  6. Kakurai M, Umemoto N, Yokokura H, Fujiwara T, Yoneda K, Demitsu T. Unusual clinical features of coma blister mimicking contact dermatitis in rhabdomyolysis: report of a case. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:761-3.
  7. Kashiwagi M, Ishigami A, Hara K, Matsusue A, Waters B, Takayama M, et al. Immunohistochemical investigation of the coma blister and its pathogenesis. J Med Invest 2013;60:256-61.