Original Article

Comparison of High Intensity Laser and Epicondylitis Bandage in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

Volume 31 · Issue 3 Publish Date: September 30, 2016
Full Text PDF HTML
DOI
Ali SALLI
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey image/svg+xml
Ekrem AKKURT
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey image/svg+xml
Alparslan Ali İZKİ
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey image/svg+xml
Zafer ŞEN
Orthopaedia and Traumatology, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey image/svg+xml
Halim YILMAZ
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey image/svg+xml
Ali SALLI, Ekrem AKKURT, Alparslan Ali İZKİ, Zafer ŞEN, & Halim YILMAZ. (2016). Comparison of High Intensity Laser and Epicondylitis Bandage in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. Archives of Rheumatology, 31(3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2016.5793
Full Text PDF HTML

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and epicondylitis bandage treatment in patients with lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Patients and methods: Sixty-five patients with unilateral LE (18 males, 47 females; mean age 46.5±8.1 years; range 30 to 61 years) with unilateral complaints were included. Patients were randomly assigned into two treatment groups. The first group (n=31) was treated with HILT for 10 sessions, while the second group (n=34) used only LE bandage for treatment. The patients were assessed for handgrip strength, pain, disability, and quality of life at baseline and sixth week after treatment by using visual analog scale, the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 (SF-36).

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in all evaluated parameters including pain scores, hand grip strength, disability, and SF-36 scores at sixth week after the treatment (all p<0.05). A comparison of percentage changes in parameters between treatment groups did not show a significant difference, except for resting visual analog scale (p=0.036) and SF-36 physical component subscale (p=0.049) scores which indicated better improvement in HILT group.

Conclusion: Our findings showed significant improvement in handgrip strength, pain, disability, and quality of life parameters in both groups. However, HILT produced better resting visual analog scale and SF-36 physical component subscale scores compared to LE bandage.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Archives of Rheumatology
Volume / Issue Volume 31 · Issue 3
Pages 234-238
History
Published Online September 30, 2016
License
Affiliations
Ali SALLI
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey
Ekrem AKKURT
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey
Alparslan Ali İZKİ
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey
Zafer ŞEN
Orthopaedia and Traumatology, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey
Halim YILMAZ
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey
Cite this Article
Ali SALLI, Ekrem AKKURT, Alparslan Ali İZKİ, Zafer ŞEN, & Halim YILMAZ. (2016). Comparison of High Intensity Laser and Epicondylitis Bandage in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. Archives of Rheumatology, 31(3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2016.5793
Share
Outlines