Original Article

Assessment of the Artificial Intelligence– Generated Fibromyalgia Information: Beyond the Hype

Volume 40 · Issue 3 · September 2025 Publish Date: September 1, 2025
Full Text PDF HTML
DOI
Mert Zure ORCID
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye image/svg+xml
Ahmet Kıvanç Menekşeoğlu ORCID
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mvz Berlinomed, Berlin, Germany image/svg+xml
Zure, M., & Menekşeoğlu, A. K. (2025). Assessment of the Artificial Intelligence– Generated Fibromyalgia Information: Beyond the Hype. Archives of Rheumatology, 40(3), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.11149
Full Text PDF HTML

Abstract

Background/Aims: Individuals increasingly turn to artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots for health-related information; however, the accuracy and usability of their responses remain uncertain. This study assessed the quality, comprehensiveness, and readability of responses from 6 AI chatbots—ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o (OpenAI), Copilot AI (Microsoft), Perplexity AI (Perplexity.AI), Gemini AI (Google), and ChatSonic AI (Writesonic)—to the most commonly searched fibromyalgia-related queries.

Materials and Methods: The top 10 most frequently searched fibromyalgia-related questions from the past 2 years were retrieved from the Google Trends database. Each chatbot was queried separately, and a total of 60 responses (10 per chatbot) were assessed both qualitatively and quantitatively by 2 reviewers, focusing on content quality, accuracy, readability, and alignment with evidence-based guidelines.

Results: ChatGPT-3.5 had the lowest Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score (20.6 ± 4.5), indicating very low quality information, while Gemini achieved the highest (40.5 ± 5), which was still classified as low quality. Understandability was moderate for Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity (67.2) but lowest for ChatGPT-3.5 (43.2 ± 10.2). Actionability was weak and the misinformation assessment revealed a moderate level across all chatbots. Readability scores indicated university-level complexity, with ChatGPT-4o having the lowest Reading Ease score (11.3 ± 11.2) and Copilot the highest (30.3 ± 13.2).

Conclusion: While AI chatbots provide accessible health information, their accuracy and depth vary. Gemini, Copilot, and Perplexity AI showed better quality, but citation inconsistencies, readability challenges, and misinformation risks highlight the need for refinement beyond the hype. Clinicians should guide fibromyalgia patients in critically assessing AI-generated health content. Future research should explore improvements in AI chatbot applicability for medical inquiries.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Archives of Rheumatology
Volume / Issue Volume 40 · Issue 3 · September 2025
Pages 358-364
History
Published Online September 1, 2025
Copyright
Affiliations
1
Mert Zure ORCID
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
2
Ahmet Kıvanç Menekşeoğlu ORCID
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mvz Berlinomed, Berlin, Germany
Cite this Article
Zure, M., & Menekşeoğlu, A. K. (2025). Assessment of the Artificial Intelligence– Generated Fibromyalgia Information: Beyond the Hype. Archives of Rheumatology, 40(3), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.11149
Share
Outlines